Channing Tatum has denied claims he is using a burner Instagram account to troll his exes, following claims from eagle-eyed fans.
After discovering an Instagram account under the name Nonya Bidness, users realised the page had only one follower – Channing – and recently commented on a PDA post about his ex-fiancée Zoe Kravitz and her new fiancé Harry Styles.
‘Just here for the hate,’ the comment read, while in another comment, Nonya Bidness seemed to reference actress Jenna Dewan, who he was with from 2009 to 2019.
In the wake of the ructions, Channing took to his official Instagram page to write: ‘Yo truly can’t believe yall think this is what I’m doing with my free time. F**kin hilarious…
‘Also why would I follow a burner account if I didn’t want people to connect me to it? Wtf come on. If I really need to say it, I only have one IG account @channingtatum’.
In an echo of his words, Jenna seemed to confirm he was not behind the account when she liked a video by blogger Stephanie Tleiji, who broke down her theory that Nonya Bidness was formerly a Channing fan page.
Channing Tatum has denied claims he is using a burner Instagram account to troll his exes, following claims from eagle-eyed fans
After discovering an Instagram account under the name Nonya Bidness, users realised the page had only one follower – Channing – and recently commented on a PDA post about his ex-fiancée Zoe Kravitz and her new fiancé Harry Styles (Harry and Zoe in March)
In an echo of his words, Jenna seemed to confirm he was not behind the account when she liked a video by blogger Stephanie Tleiji, who broke down her theory that Nonya Bidness was formerly a Channing fan page.
In the video liked by Jenna, Stephanie explained the account was likely to have been a Channing fan page before undergoing three changes over the years as confirmed on Instagram.
Following a reboot, the account owner could have changed their name and removed followers but kept Channing – as he follows a number of his own fan pages. When somebody queried whether the account was him, a user wrote: ‘I’m not him.’
The trolling comments from ‘Nonya’ saw her hit back in response to a comment that if a woman was dating a younger man with a 20-year age gap – in a nod to Zoe being 37 and Harry being 32.
Nonya wrote: ‘You don’t know me. You have no idea what I would say. But let me give you a hint: they’re both adults, let them live. I am not “everyone.”’
When another person responded that if a woman was dating a younger man with a 20-year age gap, it prompted Nonya Bidness to hit back.
In another comment fans discovered, Nonya Bidness referenced Channing’s past comments about Zoe.
Channing was with ex-wife Jenna Dewan from 2009-2019 (pictured in 2017)
Eagle-eyed fans think Channing may be leaving comments on social media posts about his exes including Zoe (pictured in 2024)
In a July 2022 interview, the Magic Mike actor told Entertainment Tonight: ‘She sees right through a lot of people’s stuff and really, just who they are to her is really simple. She’s one of the more intentional people I’ve ever met in my life.’
He was expressing awe at her clarity and focus while she directed her directorial debut movie, Blink Twice.
Channing starred in the movie during his three-year relationship with the star, which ended in October 2024.
¿Just here for the hate,¿ a Nonya Bidness comment on a post about Kravitz and Harry Styles read
In one comment Nonya Bidness seemed to reference Channing’s ex-wife, Jenna
In another comment fans discovered, Nonya Bidness referenced his past comments about Zoe
Nonya Bidness commented on Instagram: ‘When I see these two I think back at how her former fiancé called her the most intentional person he knows. I wonder how contextual he was being…’
When another user probed about what the comment meant, Nonya Bidness clarified: ‘To me intentional = calculated. He was speaking in terms of film-making but leaning towards her as a person in general too.
‘Now she is constantly spotted with Harry compared to the ex who we heard about long before they were seen together. And when they were seen together it was far less frequent.’
